چکیده فارسی: نوشتار حاضر باتوجه به نفوذ و ترویج ایدههای سکولاریستی در تربیت درصدد است ایده «آموزش درباره ادیان» را −که هدفش آموزش صلح، رواداری، احترام به دیگران و آموزش ادیان به مثابه مقولاتی تاریخی و فرهنگی است و شناخت و التزام و ایمان و اعتقاد به یک دین مدنظر نیست− را از منظر فقه تربیتی بررسی نماید و با پایبندی به روششناسی «تفقه تربیتی» تلاش کرده است هفت استدلال بر ممنوعیت و حرمت ایده فوق اقامه نماید و ایده/تجویز «آموزش درباره ادیان» را از منظر عقلی بخاطر قُبح إغراء به جهل و إضلال و ظلم، تقبیح نماید و نیز آن را مصداقِ ترک واجب، إضلال، شبههافکنی، سلطه کفار، تسنین سنن حرام و در نهایت مصداقِ علمِ غیرنافع و علم مأخوذ از غیر اهلبیت بهشمار آورد.
“Teaching about Religions” as an Alternative for “Teaching Religion” from the Educational Jurisprudence
English Abstract: The relationship between religion and education has long been considered. And for some time now, the presence and absence of religion in formal public education has been considered. And various ideas have been put forward to eliminate religion in school. The idea of “teaching about religions” as an alternative to “teaching religion” was raised and promoted since the 1950s. The purpose of the idea of “teaching about religions” is to teach peace, tolerance, respect for others, and to teach religions as historical and cultural categories. And knowledge, commitment, faith and belief in a religion are not considered. Considering the influence and promotion of secularist ideas in education, this article seeks to examine this idea from the perspective of educational jurisprudence. It makes seven arguments on the prohibition and sanctity of the above idea, and bans the idea of "teaching about religions" intellectually because of the ugliness of oppression and misleading others. It also critiques this idea by means of jurisprudential arguments, and proves the idea of "teaching about religions instead of teaching religion" has a jurisprudential prohibition due to the domination of infidels and the prohibition of misleading others